How to Choose an Anti-Bullying Program for Your School
Every school needs an effective anti-bullying strategy. But with countless programs, curricula, and approaches available, how do administrators and educators choose one that will actually work? The story in “Outnumbered” shows what’s possible when a school community—teachers, students, and peers—come together to stand against bullying. But that kind of culture doesn’t happen by accident. It requires intentional, evidence-based programming.
This guide helps schools evaluate, select, and implement anti-bullying programs that create lasting change, not just check compliance boxes.
Why Schools Need Formal Anti-Bullying Programs
The Scope of the Problem
Current statistics:
- 20-30% of students report being bullied at school
- 70% of students witness bullying
- Only 20-30% of victims report to adults
- Bullying peaks in middle school but occurs at all levels
- Cyberbullying affects approximately 15-20% of students
Impact on School Climate
Bullying affects everyone, not just victims:
- Reduced sense of safety
- Lower academic achievement school-wide
- Increased absenteeism
- Higher disciplinary incidents
- Teacher stress and turnover
- Damaged school reputation
Legal and Ethical Obligations
Schools are required to:
- Provide safe learning environments
- Comply with anti-bullying laws (vary by state)
- Address harassment based on protected characteristics
- Respond to reports appropriately
- Document incidents and interventions
Failure to address bullying can result in:
- Legal liability
- Loss of funding
- Federal investigations (particularly for harassment)
- Lawsuits from families
What Makes an Anti-Bullying Program Effective?
Evidence-Based Components
Research consistently shows effective programs include:
1. Whole-School Approach
Not just curriculum but culture change:
- Involves all stakeholders (students, staff, families, community)
- Addresses physical, social, and digital spaces
- Integrates into all aspects of school life
- Sustained over time, not one-time interventions
2. Clear Policies and Consequences
Everyone knows:
- What bullying is (specific definition)
- What behaviors are prohibited
- How to report
- What happens when bullying occurs
- Consistent enforcement across all students
3. Adult Training and Engagement
All staff (not just teachers):
- Can recognize bullying
- Know how to intervene
- Understand reporting procedures
- Model prosocial behavior
- Supervise effectively
4. Student Empowerment
Students are partners, not just recipients:
- Taught to be upstanders, not bystanders
- Given voice in solution development
- Participate in peer leadership programs
- Learn social-emotional skills
5. Social-Emotional Learning (SEL)
Teaches skills:
- Empathy and perspective-taking
- Emotional regulation
- Conflict resolution
- Relationship building
- Responsible decision-making
6. Increased Supervision
Strategic presence in:
- Hallways between classes
- Cafeteria during lunch
- Playground/recess
- Bathrooms
- Bus loading/unloading
- Before and after school
- Digital spaces (appropriate monitoring)
7. Parent and Community Involvement
Families are informed and engaged:
- Communication about policies
- Education on recognizing and addressing bullying
- Partnerships in prevention efforts
- Involvement in school climate initiatives
8. Data Collection and Assessment
Regular monitoring:
- Incident tracking
- Climate surveys (students, staff, families)
- Measurement of program fidelity
- Outcome evaluation
- Continuous improvement based on data
What Research Says Works
Meta-analyses show effective programs:
- Reduce bullying by 20-23% on average
- Reduce victimization by 17-20%
- Improve school climate significantly
- Have long-term, sustained benefits
Most effective programs:
- Last at least one year (ongoing is better)
- Include intensive training for staff
- Implement consistent consequences
- Use multiple strategies simultaneously
- Are age-appropriate
- Include parent education
Evaluating Specific Programs
Step 1: Assess Your School’s Needs
Before selecting a program, understand your context:
Collect Baseline Data
Conduct:
- Anonymous student climate surveys
- Staff surveys about bullying observations
- Review discipline data (bullying-related incidents)
- Analyze attendance patterns
- Interview students, staff, parents
Identify:
- Prevalence of different types of bullying (physical, verbal, social, cyber)
- Hot spots (locations where bullying occurs most)
- Vulnerable populations (who’s most targeted)
- Current strengths and gaps in response
- Available resources (budget, time, personnel)
Define Goals
What do you want to achieve?
- Reduce specific types of bullying
- Improve bystander intervention rates
- Increase reporting
- Enhance sense of safety
- Develop school-wide positive climate
- Address specific issues (cyberbullying, LGBTQ+ safety, racial bullying)
Be specific: “Reduce physical bullying incidents by 30% in one year” rather than “reduce bullying.”
Consider Your Context
School factors:
- Grade levels served (elementary, middle, high school)
- School size
- Demographics (socioeconomic, cultural, linguistic diversity)
- Current school climate and culture
- Staff capacity and buy-in
- Budget constraints
- Previous attempts (what worked, what didn’t)
Step 2: Research Program Options
Evidence-Based Programs
Elementary School Programs:
Olweus Bullying Prevention Program (OBPP)
- Most researched program internationally
- Whole-school approach
- Requires significant training and resources
- Evidence: Strong, particularly for reducing bullying
- Cost: Moderate to high
Steps to Respect
- Elementary focus (grades 3-6)
- Includes teacher training and student curriculum
- Evidence: Moderate; reduces bullying and increases staff response
- Cost: Moderate
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)
- Broader than just bullying; addresses all behavior
- Data-driven, tiered approach
- Strong implementation support available
- Evidence: Strong for overall climate; moderate specifically for bullying
- Cost: Variable; can be implemented with existing resources
Second Step
- SEL curriculum with bullying prevention components
- Ages 4-14
- Teaches empathy, emotion management, problem-solving
- Evidence: Strong for SEL skills; moderate for bullying reduction
- Cost: Moderate
Middle and High School Programs:
KiVa
- Developed in Finland, now used internationally
- Focus on bystanders becoming defenders
- Includes digital game component
- Evidence: Strong in research studies
- Cost: Moderate to high
Bully Busters
- Teacher training program
- Focus on adult intervention and response
- Evidence: Moderate
- Cost: Low to moderate
Youth Voice Project
- Student-led, emphasizing youth agency
- Based on research of what actually helps victims
- Focus on peer support strategies
- Evidence: Emerging; promising results
- Cost: Low
Restorative Practices
- Addresses harm through dialogue and accountability
- Builds community and relationships
- Can be used alongside other programs
- Evidence: Moderate; strong for climate and conflict
- Cost: Variable; requires training
Universal vs. Targeted Programs
Universal programs:
- Applied to all students
- Preventive focus
- Build positive climate
- Examples: PBIS, Second Step
Targeted programs:
- For at-risk students
- More intensive
- Address specific behaviors
- Examples: Social skills groups, mentoring, counseling
Best approach: Multi-tiered (universal foundation + targeted support)
Step 3: Evaluate Program Quality
Use these criteria to assess any program:
Evidence of Effectiveness
Questions to ask:
- Has it been rigorously evaluated (randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs)?
- Were results published in peer-reviewed journals?
- Has it been replicated in multiple sites?
- Does it work with diverse populations?
- How large were the effects?
- Were effects sustained over time?
Red flags:
- Testimonials instead of data
- Only evaluated by program developers
- No control groups in research
- Cherry-picked outcomes
Implementation Requirements
Consider:
- Training required (time, cost, ongoing support)
- Time commitment (classroom time, staff meeting time)
- Materials and costs
- Flexibility to adapt to your context
- Support provided during implementation
- Sustainability (can you maintain it long-term?)
Warning signs:
- One-day training with no follow-up
- Rigid, no adaptation allowed
- Requires extensive time in already packed schedule
- Expensive annual fees
- Limited ongoing support
Age-Appropriateness
Ensure program:
- Matches developmental stage of students
- Uses appropriate language and concepts
- Engages students at their level
- Addresses age-specific bullying dynamics
Example: Elementary students need concrete, simple strategies. High schoolers need complex discussions about power, identity, and digital citizenship.
Cultural Responsiveness
Program should:
- Acknowledge diverse experiences and backgrounds
- Include diverse examples and perspectives
- Be adaptable to cultural contexts
- Address specific types of bias-based bullying
- Include materials in relevant languages
Avoid:
- One-size-fits-all approaches
- Cultural stereotypes
- Ignoring intersectionality
- Programs developed for different contexts without adaptation
Alignment with Your Goals and Values
Does it:
- Address your specific needs (based on your assessment)?
- Align with school’s educational philosophy?
- Complement existing initiatives (SEL, PBIS, character education)?
- Fit with disciplinary approach (punitive vs. restorative)?
Step 4: Consider Practical Factors
Budget
Total costs include:
- Initial training
- Materials and curriculum
- Ongoing training and consultation
- Staff time (planning, implementation, meetings)
- Technology or resources needed
- Evaluation and data collection
Funding sources:
- School/district budget
- Grants (federal, state, foundation)
- PTA/PTO fundraising
- Community partnerships
Budget-friendly options:
- Build on existing programs (add bullying prevention to SEL curriculum)
- Free or low-cost programs (many state departments of education offer resources)
- Peer-led initiatives with adult supervision
- Utilize existing staff expertise
Staff Buy-In
Critical success factor: Staff must believe in and commit to the program.
Strategies to build buy-in:
- Involve staff in selection process (survey, committee)
- Share data showing need
- Provide comprehensive training
- Start with willing champions
- Address concerns honestly
- Provide ongoing support
- Recognize and celebrate efforts
Warning: Top-down mandates without buy-in often fail.
Time and Sustainability
Questions:
- Can we implement this with fidelity given our schedule?
- Will it still be feasible in year 2? Year 5?
- What happens when key champions leave?
- How will we maintain momentum?
Look for:
- Programs that become integrated into regular practice, not add-ons
- Scalable approaches (start small, expand)
- Built-in sustainability plans
- Alumni networks or communities of practice
Implementation: Setting Your Program Up for Success
Phase 1: Planning (3-6 months before launch)
Form implementation team:
- Administrators (decision-making authority)
- Teachers (multiple grade levels)
- Counselors/social workers
- Students (middle/high school)
- Parents
- Community members
Develop implementation plan:
- Timeline
- Roles and responsibilities
- Training schedule
- Communication plan
- Budget allocation
- Evaluation plan
Prepare infrastructure:
- Revise or create bullying policy
- Establish reporting systems
- Allocate resources
- Schedule training
Phase 2: Training (1-3 months before launch)
Train all staff:
- Not just teachers—bus drivers, cafeteria workers, custodians, office staff
- Consistent message and approach
- Opportunities for practice (role-plays, scenarios)
- Written materials for reference
- Ongoing coaching available
Train student leaders:
- Peer mediators
- Student council
- Upstander program participants
- Classroom representatives
Educate parents:
- Information sessions
- Written materials
- Website resources
- Involvement opportunities
Phase 3: Launch and Early Implementation
Kick-off events:
- School-wide assembly
- Classroom lessons
- Parent nights
- Visible campaigns (posters, pledges)
Intensive monitoring:
- Daily check-ins with staff
- Troubleshoot problems immediately
- Celebrate successes
- Adjust as needed
Communication:
- Regular updates to all stakeholders
- Highlight positive examples
- Reinforce key messages
- Maintain visibility
Phase 4: Sustained Implementation
Make it routine:
- Integrate into regular practices
- Annual refresher training
- Onboard new staff
- Continuous student education
Monitor fidelity:
- Are components being implemented as designed?
- What modifications are being made?
- What barriers exist?
Provide ongoing support:
- Coaching and consultation
- Problem-solving sessions
- Community of practice
- Resources and materials
Phase 5: Evaluation and Improvement
Collect data regularly:
- Incident reports
- Climate surveys (at least annually)
- Behavioral data
- Academic indicators
- Attendance data
Analyze and share:
- What’s working?
- What needs improvement?
- Are we meeting goals?
- Share results with stakeholders
Make adjustments:
- Based on data, not assumptions
- Pilot changes before school-wide implementation
- Document modifications
Continuous improvement cycle:
- Plan → Implement → Evaluate → Adjust → Repeat
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
1. One-and-Done Approach
Problem: Single assembly or one-day training Why it fails: Bullying prevention requires sustained effort Solution: Multi-year, integrated approach
2. Focusing Only on Bullies and Victims
Problem: Ignoring bystanders Why it fails: Peers have huge influence; bystanders enable or stop bullying Solution: Comprehensive upstander education
3. Punitive-Only Approach
Problem: Only consequences, no skill-building Why it fails: Doesn’t teach alternative behaviors or address root causes Solution: Balance accountability with education and support
4. Curriculum Without Culture Change
Problem: Teaching lessons but not changing environment Why it fails: Knowledge doesn’t translate to behavior if culture doesn’t support it Solution: Whole-school approach addressing policies, practices, environment
5. Lack of Adult Supervision
Problem: Not enough eyes in hallways, cafeterias, etc. Why it fails: Bullying happens in unsupervised spaces Solution: Strategic staffing and supervision in hot spots
6. Ignoring Cyberbullying
Problem: Focus only on in-person bullying Why it fails: Digital bullying is pervasive and harmful Solution: Include digital citizenship and cyberbullying in programming
7. No Family Involvement
Problem: Schools work in isolation from families Why it fails: Parents need to reinforce messages and address issues at home Solution: Active parent education and partnership
8. Inadequate Training
Problem: Brief training without ongoing support Why it fails: Staff need depth of knowledge and practice to implement well Solution: Comprehensive initial training + ongoing coaching
9. Not Measuring Impact
Problem: Assuming program works without data Why it fails: Can’t improve what you don’t measure Solution: Regular data collection and evaluation
10. Giving Up Too Soon
Problem: Expecting immediate results Why it fails: Culture change takes time; problems may increase initially as reporting increases Solution: Commit to multi-year implementation; track progress over time
Special Considerations
Elementary Schools
Unique needs:
- Simpler language and concepts
- Heavy emphasis on adult response
- Developmentally appropriate consequences
- Focus on building empathy and basic social skills
- Parent partnership especially important
Effective strategies:
- Classroom lessons on kindness and inclusion
- Clear, consistent rules
- Structured recess activities
- Teaching social skills explicitly
- Literature-based discussions (like reading “Outnumbered” together)
Middle Schools
Unique challenges:
- Most bullying occurs at this level
- Complex social hierarchies
- Puberty and identity development
- Increased digital interaction
- Reluctance to report to adults
Effective strategies:
- Peer leadership programs
- Advisory or homeroom focused on social-emotional learning
- Anonymous reporting systems
- Cyberbullying education
- Student voice in solutions
High Schools
Unique context:
- More sophisticated bullying (social/relational, cyberbullying)
- Resistance to programs perceived as “childish”
- Greater student autonomy
- Dating violence concerns
- Bias-based harassment
Effective strategies:
- Student-led initiatives
- Integration into advisory, health, or English curriculum
- Peer mentoring/mediation
- Restorative practices
- Addressing specific issues (LGBTQ+ safety, racial climate, sexual harassment)
Special Populations
Additional considerations for:
Students with disabilities:
- Higher rates of bullying victimization
- May need explicit social skills instruction
- Ensure IEPs address social-emotional needs
- Educate peers about disabilities and inclusion
LGBTQ+ students:
- Face significant bias-based bullying
- Need explicit inclusion and affirmation
- GSAs (Gender-Sexuality Alliances) provide support
- All-school education on gender identity and sexual orientation
Students of color:
- May experience racial bullying and microaggressions
- Need culturally responsive programming
- Address both interpersonal and institutional bias
- Partner with families and community
English Language Learners:
- May be targeted due to language/accent
- Need materials in home languages
- Build cross-cultural understanding
- Ensure they know how to report
Measuring Success
Leading Indicators (Process Measures)
Track implementation:
- Training completion rates
- Lesson delivery (are teachers implementing curriculum?)
- Policy adherence
- Parent engagement
- Student participation in programs
Outcome Measures
What you want to change:
- Bullying incidents (reported and observed)
- Victimization rates (from surveys)
- Bystander intervention rates
- School climate scores
- Sense of safety
- Student, staff, parent satisfaction
Data Sources
Multiple measures provide complete picture:
- Anonymous climate surveys (most reliable for actual rates)
- Discipline/incident reports (may increase initially as reporting improves)
- Focus groups with students, staff, parents
- Behavioral observations
- Academic data (grades, test scores)
- Attendance and truancy data
Interpreting Results
Year 1: May see increase in reports as awareness grows—this is good!
Year 2-3: Should see decrease in actual bullying (per surveys) even if reports remain steady
Long-term: Sustained low rates, positive climate, strong sense of community
Resources for Schools
Free and Low-Cost Resources
StopBullying.gov
- Federal website with extensive free resources
- Evidence-based practices
- Training modules
- Downloadable materials
PACER’s National Bullying Prevention Center
- Classroom activities
- Student engagement tools
- Parent resources
- Annual Unity Day campaign
Teaching Tolerance (Learning for Justice)
- Free classroom resources
- Focus on bias, identity, social justice
- Age-specific lessons
Common Sense Media
- Digital citizenship curriculum (free)
- Age-by-age guides
- Parent resources
State Education Department Resources
- Most states offer free anti-bullying resources, training, and technical assistance
Professional Organizations
National Association of School Psychologists (NASP)
- Position papers and resources
ASCD (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development)
- Books, webinars, professional development
National School Climate Center
- Climate surveys and support
FAQ: Choosing Anti-Bullying Programs
Q: How much should we budget for an anti-bullying program? A: Ranges from $0 (building on existing resources) to $50,000+ for comprehensive programs in large schools. Most effective programs cost $3,000-$15,000 annually including training and materials.
Q: Can we create our own program instead of buying one? A: Yes, if you have expertise and resources. Use evidence-based components and evaluate rigorously. Many schools combine multiple resources to create custom approaches.
Q: How do we get staff buy-in if teachers feel overwhelmed? A: Involve them in decision-making, show how program addresses problems they’re experiencing, start small with volunteers, integrate into existing practices rather than adding on, provide adequate training and support.
Q: What if our program isn’t working? A: First, assess implementation fidelity—are you doing what the program requires? If yes, re-evaluate your data—is the problem different than you thought? Consider modifications or switching programs. Get external consultation.
Q: Do we need to address cyberbullying separately? A: Most comprehensive programs now include cyberbullying. If yours doesn’t, add digital citizenship curriculum. Modern bullying is often hybrid.
Conclusion: Creating Safe Schools Where All Students Thrive
The transformation we see in “Outnumbered”—where Jack’s classmates move from bystanders to upstanders, where the school becomes a place of safety and belonging—doesn’t happen by chance. It requires committed adults implementing evidence-based programs with fidelity and persistence.
Choosing the right program is crucial but remember:
-
No single program is magic. Success requires adaptation to your context, consistent implementation, and ongoing commitment.
-
Culture matters more than curriculum. The best materials won’t work if school culture doesn’t support them.
-
Everyone must be involved. Students, staff, families, and community all play roles.
-
It takes time. Expect 2-3 years to see significant change. Don’t give up.
-
Data guides improvement. Regular assessment helps you adjust and improve.
The goal isn’t perfection—it’s progress. Each student who learns to be an upstander, each incident addressed effectively, each parent engaged, each teacher trained—all of these move you toward a school where every child feels safe, valued, and able to learn.
Your students deserve a school where bullying isn’t tolerated, where diversity is celebrated, where conflicts are resolved respectfully, and where every child can thrive. The right anti-bullying program, implemented with commitment and care, makes that vision reality.
Looking for a powerful tool to start conversations about bullying prevention? “Outnumbered” shows students what upstander behavior looks like and demonstrates that together, they can create positive change. Perfect for classroom read-alouds and school-wide initiatives.